Chapter 40

PERSPECTIVE: DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS OF TDVP VERSUS OTHER TOES

"The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us."
Paul Valery, 1895 (Philosopher, 1871 - 1945)

. How is the Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) model distinguished from other Theories of Everything (TOEs)?

. What other TOEs share certain characteristics with TDVP?

. And in what ways are the concepts found in TDVP unique? In this chapter, we address these areas.

1. Essentially, TDVP is not only a TOE: it is a complete mathematical-logical, empirical paradigm for reality covering physical, biological and psychological sciences. (We do not know of any other comprehensive paradigm like this).

2. TDVP involves s a major paradigm shift because of its great scientific and philosophical implications. It can apparently be applied to all disciplines. This is unique. Some TOEs with similar bases, e.g., CST or multidimensionality can be applied to some (but none to the life sciences, for example). So this is unique.

3. TDVP has demonstrable mathematical and empirical supporting data. It has a solid mathematical and logical foundation, is empirically feasible using LFAF in the physical, biological, social and consciousness sciences, it forms its own philosophical model, and is mystically compatible with some traditions (e.g., Kabbalic and Vedic). This is unique.

4. "Consciousness" is far more broadly defined (We do not know of any other comprehensive definition like this with the three elements of any of meaningful reality, brain consciousness and metaconscious). This is unique.

5. The tethering of CST from the Origin Event is unique. Mysticism sometimes perceives this but does not allow the freedom away implied in content by vortices and in process by indivension. This is unique.

6. CST being ubiquitous in all things from the subquantal thought to astrophysical may have been mystically implied, but not so rigorously defined.

7. The Primary Receptor with the concepts of relative infinity: We do not know of any other scientific, non-mystical paradigm like this that recognizes an infinite receptor, ab initio. Of course, this is conceptually and philosophically basic to most religions.

8. The calculus of distinctions provides an important logical mathematical link of C- substrate. This was developed by Dr. Close, is unique to TOEs and is necessary to allow the model to have a logical consistency particularly in applying C-substrate to dimensionality190. This is unique to TDVP.

9. Individual-units and indivension is a critical concept. .........

(The chapter continues...)

Additional Excerpts

Chapter 4 - WHAT THE STANDARD MODEL LACKS. SOME QUESTIONS TO RESOLVE

Chapter 40 - PERSPECTIVE: DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS OF TDVP VERSUS OTHER TOES

Chapter 47 - IS TDVP TRULY A METAPARADIGM?

Ordering Information

Read our Disclaimer, Contact Information, and Copyright Notice
Contact Webmaster

Chapter 40

PERSPECTIVE: DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS OF TDVP VERSUS OTHER TOES

"The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us." Paul Valery, 1895 (Philosopher, 1871 - 1945)

"The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us."
Paul Valery, 1895 (Philosopher, 1871 - 1945)